On 01.03.2016 13:27, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 01:06:11PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 01.03.2016 12:51, Laurent Vivier wrote: >>> >>> On 01/03/2016 11:08, Thomas Huth wrote: >>>> Introduce a test for sPAPR hypercalls, starting with the >>>> three hypercalls H_SET_SPRG0, H_PAGE_INIT and H_RANDOM. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> ... >>> Is it possible to have a message for the H_RANDOM test, something like >>> "not supported"? >> >> I initially had something like that in my code, but the output like >> >> PASS: hypercall: h_random: not supported >> >> then also looks somewhat strange ... >> >> Is there already a common sense how to (not) report missing and thus >> untestable features in kvm-unit-tests? Something like >> >> SKIP: hypercall: h_random: not supported >> >> would be posh, I think... > > We have XFAIL (instead of SKIP). So you could maybe do something like > > report_xfail(fmt, !is_supported, test_passed, ...) Ah, that looks fine, thanks for the hint, I'll change my patch to use it! Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
