RE: VFIO based vGPU(was Re: [Announcement] 2015-Q3 release of XenGT - a Mediated ...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 6:08 AM
> 
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today KVMGT (not using VFIO yet) registers I/O emulation callbacks to
> > > > KVM, so VM MMIO access will be forwarded to KVMGT directly for
> > > > emulation in kernel. If we reuse above R/W flags, the whole emulation
> > > > path would be unnecessarily long with obvious performance impact. We
> > > > either need a new flag here to indicate in-kernel emulation (bias from
> > > > passthrough support), or just hide the region alternatively (let KVMGT
> > > > to handle I/O emulation itself like today).
> > >
> > > That sounds like a future optimization TBH.  There's very strict
> > > layering between vfio and kvm.  Physical device assignment could make
> > > use of it as well, avoiding a round trip through userspace when an
> > > ioread/write would do.  Userspace also needs to orchestrate those kinds
> > > of accelerators, there might be cases where userspace wants to see those
> > > transactions for debugging or manipulating the device.  We can't simply
> > > take shortcuts to provide such direct access.  Thanks,
> > >
> >
> > But we have to balance such debugging flexibility and acceptable performance.
> > To me the latter one is more important otherwise there'd be no real usage
> > around this technique, while for debugging there are other alternative (e.g.
> > ftrace) Consider some extreme case with 100k traps/second and then see
> > how much impact a 2-3x longer emulation path can bring...
> 
> Are you jumping to the conclusion that it cannot be done with proper
> layering in place?  Performance is important, but it's not an excuse to
> abandon designing interfaces between independent components.  Thanks,
> 

Two are not controversial. My point is to remove unnecessary long trip
as possible. After another thought, yes we can reuse existing read/write
flags:
	- KVMGT will expose a private control variable whether in-kernel
delivery is required;
	- when the variable is true, KVMGT will register in-kernel MMIO 
emulation callbacks then VM MMIO request will be delivered to KVMGT 
directly;
	- when the variable is false, KVMGT will not register anything. 
VM MMIO request will then be delivered to Qemu and then ioread/write
will be used to finally reach KVMGT emulation logic;

Thanks
Kevin
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����o�^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux