> -----Original Message----- > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 6:42 PM > To: Wu, Feng <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx>; Radim Krcmár <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86: Use vector-hashing to deliver lowest- > priority interrupts > > > > On 18/01/2016 06:19, Wu, Feng wrote: > > However, > > this will make the vector-hashing lowest-priority handling slightly different > > compare to round-robin, since RR checks "!dst[i]" before injecting the > > interrupts. What is your opinion about it? Thanks a lot! > > I think Radim's suggestion is fine. You can print an error (just once > per guest) to dmesg if the result of the hashing computation corresponds > to a disabled APIC. Good idea, is there already a convenient way to do this in KVM? Thanks, Feng > > Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
