On 18/01/2016 06:19, Wu, Feng wrote: > However, > this will make the vector-hashing lowest-priority handling slightly different > compare to round-robin, since RR checks "!dst[i]" before injecting the > interrupts. What is your opinion about it? Thanks a lot! I think Radim's suggestion is fine. You can print an error (just once per guest) to dmesg if the result of the hashing computation corresponds to a disabled APIC. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html