Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> That said, I don't think we're bound today by the fact that we're in  
>> userspace.  Rather we're bound by the interfaces we have between the  
>> host kernel and userspace to generate IO.  I'd rather fix those  
>> interfaces than put more stuff in the kernel.
> 
> And more stuff in the kernel can come at the potential cost of weakening
> protection/isolation.

Protection/isolation always comes at a cost.  Not everyone wants
to pay that, just like health insurance :) We should enable the
users to choose which model they want, based on their needs.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux