Re: [RFC PATCH 00/17] virtual-bus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That said, I don't think we're bound today by the fact that we're in 
> userspace.  Rather we're bound by the interfaces we have between the 
> host kernel and userspace to generate IO.  I'd rather fix those 
> interfaces than put more stuff in the kernel.

I'm sorry but I totally disagree with that.  By having our IO
infrastructure in user-space we've basically given up the main
advantage of kvm, which is that the physical drivers operate in
the same environment as the hypervisor.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux