Currently vgic_process_maintenance() processes dealing with a completed
level-triggered interrupt directly, but we are soon going to reuse this
logic for level-triggered mapped interrupts with the HW bit set, so
move this logic into a separate static function.
Probably the most scary part of this commit is convincing yourself that
the current flow is safe compared to the old one. In the following I
try to list the changes and why they are harmless:
Move vgic_irq_clear_queued after kvm_notify_acked_irq:
Harmless because the effect of clearing the queued flag wrt.
kvm_set_irq is only that vgic_update_irq_pending does not set the
pending bit on the emulated CPU interface or in the pending_on_cpu
bitmask, but we set this in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate later on if the
level is stil high.
Move vgic_set_lr before kvm_notify_acked_irq:
Also, harmless because the LR are cpu-local operations and
kvm_notify_acked only affects the dist
Move vgic_dist_irq_clear_soft_pend after kvm_notify_acked_irq:
Also harmless because it's just a bit which is cleared and altering
the line state does not affect this bit.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
index 9eb489a..c5750be 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
@@ -1312,12 +1312,56 @@ epilog:
}
}
+static int process_level_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr, struct vgic_lr vlr)
+{
+ int level_pending = 0;
+
+ vlr.state = 0;
+ vlr.hwirq = 0;
+ vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
+
+ /*
+ * If the IRQ was EOIed (called from vgic_process_maintenance) or it
+ * went from active to non-active (called from vgic_sync_hwirq) it was
+ * also ACKed and we we therefore assume we can clear the soft pending
+ * state (should it had been set) for this interrupt.
+ *
+ * Note: if the IRQ soft pending state was set after the IRQ was
+ * acked, it actually shouldn't be cleared, but we have no way of
+ * knowing that unless we start trapping ACKs when the soft-pending
+ * state is set.
+ */
+ vgic_dist_irq_clear_soft_pend(vcpu, vlr.irq);
+
+ /*
+ * Tell the gic to start sampling the line of this interrupt again.
+ */
+ vgic_irq_clear_queued(vcpu, vlr.irq);
+
+ /* Any additional pending interrupt? */
+ if (vgic_dist_irq_get_level(vcpu, vlr.irq)) {
+ vgic_cpu_irq_set(vcpu, vlr.irq);
+ level_pending = 1;
+ } else {
+ vgic_dist_irq_clear_pending(vcpu, vlr.irq);
+ vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, vlr.irq);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have
+ * been marked as empty.
+ */
+ vgic_sync_lr_elrsr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
+
+ return level_pending;
+}
+
static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
u32 status = vgic_get_interrupt_status(vcpu);
struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
- bool level_pending = false;
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
+ int level_pending = 0;
kvm_debug("STATUS = %08x\n", status);
@@ -1332,54 +1376,22 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
for_each_set_bit(lr, eisr_ptr, vgic->nr_lr) {
struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr);
- WARN_ON(vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, vlr.irq));
- spin_lock(&dist->lock);
- vgic_irq_clear_queued(vcpu, vlr.irq);
+ WARN_ON(vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, vlr.irq));
WARN_ON(vlr.state & LR_STATE_MASK);
- vlr.state = 0;
- vgic_set_lr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
- /*
- * If the IRQ was EOIed it was also ACKed and we we
- * therefore assume we can clear the soft pending
- * state (should it had been set) for this interrupt.
- *
- * Note: if the IRQ soft pending state was set after
- * the IRQ was acked, it actually shouldn't be
- * cleared, but we have no way of knowing that unless
- * we start trapping ACKs when the soft-pending state
- * is set.
- */
- vgic_dist_irq_clear_soft_pend(vcpu, vlr.irq);
/*
* kvm_notify_acked_irq calls kvm_set_irq()
- * to reset the IRQ level. Need to release the
- * lock for kvm_set_irq to grab it.
+ * to reset the IRQ level, which grabs the dist->lock
+ * so we call this before taking the dist->lock.
*/
- spin_unlock(&dist->lock);
-
kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0,
vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS);
- spin_lock(&dist->lock);
-
- /* Any additional pending interrupt? */
- if (vgic_dist_irq_get_level(vcpu, vlr.irq)) {
- vgic_cpu_irq_set(vcpu, vlr.irq);
- level_pending = true;
- } else {
- vgic_dist_irq_clear_pending(vcpu, vlr.irq);
- vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, vlr.irq);
- }
+ spin_lock(&dist->lock);
+ level_pending |= process_level_irq(vcpu, lr, vlr);
spin_unlock(&dist->lock);
-
- /*
- * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have
- * been marked as empty.
- */
- vgic_sync_lr_elrsr(vcpu, lr, vlr);
}
}
--
2.1.2.330.g565301e.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
