Re: Should KVM_GUEST stop depending on PARAVIRT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 29/07/2015 06:49, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote:
>>> You can call it even feature^Wbug, I won't take it personal. :)  It does
>>> not prevent scary messages (such as "intel_rapl: no valid rapl domains
>>> found in package 0") in the logs for example.  See
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178491 for a discussion
>>> about such scary messages.
> 
> This bug is not openly readable.

Oops, opened now.

> Which MSR accesses (in perf/etc) don't use safe {RD,WR}MSR accesses currently?

For example see boost_state in acpi-cpufreq.c and KVM commit
22d48b2d2aa0 ("KVM: svm: writes to MSR_K7_HWCR generates GPE in guest",
2014-06-26).

See also commit dc9b2d933a1d5782b70977024f862759c8ebb2f7 in KVM.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux