Re: Should KVM_GUEST stop depending on PARAVIRT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 24/07/2015 19:33, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> PARAVIRT adds a fair amount of bloat and, AFAICT, KVM_GUEST doesn't
> really need any of it.  Would it make sense to drop the dependency?

I think the main reason for PARAVIRT is that pv kernels have by default

        .read_msr = native_read_msr_safe,
        .write_msr = native_write_msr_safe,

Unfortunately Intel adds a bunch of performance measurement features
saying that "they work with this cpuid family/model/stepping" and at the
same time attach them to some non-architectural MSRs that, in principle
could be reused for something else years down the road.  This is not a
huge problem for Windows, where only tools such as vTune use these MSRs,
but it is a problem for Linux.

The alternative is ignore_msrs, but that's a very big hammer too.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux