Re: SVM: vmload/vmsave-free VM exits?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2015-04-07 08:10, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> 
> On 07.04.2015 10:43, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2015-04-05 19:12, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>> On 05.04.2015 13:31, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> studying the VM exit logic of Jailhouse, I was wondering when AMD's
>>>> vmload/vmsave can be avoided. Jailhouse as well as KVM currently use
>>>> these instructions unconditionally. However, I think both only need
>>>> GS.base, i.e. the per-cpu base address, to be saved and restored if no
>>>> user space exit or no CPU migration is involved (both is always true
>>>> for
>>>> Jailhouse). Xen avoids vmload/vmsave on lightweight exits but it also
>>>> still uses rsp-based per-cpu variables.
>>>>
>>>> So the question boils down to what is generally faster:
>>>>
>>>> A) vmload
>>>>      vmrun
>>>>      vmsave
>>>>
>>>> B) wrmsrl(MSR_GS_BASE, guest_gs_base)
>>>>      vmrun
>>>>      rdmsrl(MSR_GS_BASE, guest_gs_base)
>>>>
>>>> Of course, KVM also has to take into account that heavyweight exits
>>>> still require vmload/vmsave, thus become more expensive with B) due to
>>>> the additional MSR accesses.
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts or results of previous experiments?
>>> That's a good question, I also thought about it when I was finalizing
>>> Jailhouse AMD port. I tried "lightweight exits" with apic-demo but it
>>> didn't seem to affect the latency in any noticeable way. That's why I
>>> decided not to push the patch (in fact, I was even unable to find it
>>> now).
>>>
>>> Note however that how AMD chips store host state during VM switches are
>>> implementation-specific. I did my quick experiments on one CPU only, so
>>> your mileage may vary.
>>>
>>> Regarding your question, I feel B will be faster anyways but again I'm
>>> afraid that the gain could be within statistical error of the
>>> experiment.
>>
>> It is, at least 160 cycles with hot caches on an AMD A6-5200 APU, more
>> towards 600 if they are colder (added some usleep to each loop in the
>> test).
> Great, thanks. Could you post absolute numbers, i.e how long do A and B
> take on your CPU?

A is around 1910 cycles, B about 1750.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux