On 31/03/2015 13:16, Brad Campbell wrote: > > If you look at the bisect point I'm currently at it's a mix of i2c and > arm. The only vaguely relevant (as far as I can see) commit is the > addition of the getrandom() syscall, so my bisect is looking dodgy at > best. If I can come up with a better test case on a non-critical box > then I'll be in a better position to try and help get to the bottom of > the issue. Yes, the bisect went wrong somewhere. Still, the 'bad' commit leave both a net-next and a KVM merge, so it could be worse. :) Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
