Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers/vfio: Support EEH error injection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:10:20PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:03:59PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:43:03PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:56:36PM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:39:45PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> >> >On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 06:58:45AM +1100, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> >> >> The patch adds one more EEH sub-command (VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR)
>> >> >> to inject the specified EEH error, which is represented by
>> >> >> (struct vfio_eeh_pe_err), to the indicated PE for testing purpose.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >
>> >> >Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >>  Documentation/vfio.txt        | 12 ++++++++++++
>> >> >>  drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> >> >>  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h     | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> >> >>  3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/vfio.txt b/Documentation/vfio.txt
>> >> >> index 96978ec..c6e11a3 100644
>> >> >> --- a/Documentation/vfio.txt
>> >> >> +++ b/Documentation/vfio.txt
>> >> >> @@ -385,6 +385,18 @@ The code flow from the example above should be slightly changed:
>> >> >>  
>> >> >>  	....
>> >> >>  
>> >> >> +	/* Inject EEH error, which is expected to be caused by 32-bits
>> >> >> +	 * config load.
>> >> >> +	 */
>> >> >> +	pe_op.op = VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR;
>> >> >> +	pe_op.err.type = VFIO_EEH_ERR_TYPE_32;
>> >> >> +	pe_op.err.func = VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_CFG_ADDR;
>> >> >> +	pe_op.err.addr = 0ul;
>> >> >> +	pe_op.err.mask = 0ul;
>> >> >> +	ioctl(container, VFIO_EEH_PE_OP, &pe_op);
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> +	....
>> >> >> +
>> >> >>  	/* When 0xFF's returned from reading PCI config space or IO BARs
>> >> >>  	 * of the PCI device. Check the PE's state to see if that has been
>> >> >>  	 * frozen.
>> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
>> >> >> index 5fa42db..38edeb4 100644
>> >> >> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
>> >> >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_spapr_eeh.c
>> >> >> @@ -85,6 +85,16 @@ long vfio_spapr_iommu_eeh_ioctl(struct iommu_group *group,
>> >> >>  		case VFIO_EEH_PE_CONFIGURE:
>> >> >>  			ret = eeh_pe_configure(pe);
>> >> >>  			break;
>> >> >> +		case VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR:
>> >> >> +			minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_eeh_pe_op, err.mask);
>> >> >> +			if (op.argsz < minsz)
>> >> >> +				return -EINVAL;
>> >> >> +			if (copy_from_user(&op, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
>> >> >> +				return -EFAULT;
>> >> >> +
>> >> >> +			ret = eeh_pe_inject_err(pe, op.err.type, op.err.func,
>> >> >> +						op.err.addr, op.err.mask);
>> >> >> +			break;
>> >> >>  		default:
>> >> >>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>> >> >>  		}
>> >> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> >> >> index 82889c3..f68e962 100644
>> >> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> >> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
>> >> >> @@ -468,12 +468,23 @@ struct vfio_iommu_spapr_tce_info {
>> >> >>   * - unfreeze IO/DMA for frozen PE;
>> >> >>   * - read PE state;
>> >> >>   * - reset PE;
>> >> >> - * - configure PE.
>> >> >> + * - configure PE;
>> >> >> + * - inject EEH error.
>> >> >>   */
>> >> >> +struct vfio_eeh_pe_err {
>> >> >> +	__u32 type;
>> >> >> +	__u32 func;
>> >> >> +	__u64 addr;
>> >> >> +	__u64 mask;
>> >> >> +};
>> >> >> +
>> >> >>  struct vfio_eeh_pe_op {
>> >> >>  	__u32 argsz;
>> >> >>  	__u32 flags;
>> >> >>  	__u32 op;
>> >> >> +	union {
>> >> >> +		struct vfio_eeh_pe_err err;
>> >> >> +	};
>> >> >>  };
>> >> >>  
>> >> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_DISABLE		0	/* Disable EEH functionality */
>> >> >> @@ -490,6 +501,29 @@ struct vfio_eeh_pe_op {
>> >> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_HOT		6	/* Assert hot reset          */
>> >> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_RESET_FUNDAMENTAL	7	/* Assert fundamental reset  */
>> >> >>  #define VFIO_EEH_PE_CONFIGURE		8	/* PE configuration          */
>> >> >> +#define VFIO_EEH_PE_INJECT_ERR		9	/* Inject EEH error          */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_TYPE_32		0	/* 32-bits EEH error type    */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_TYPE_64		1	/* 64-bits EEH error type    */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_MEM_ADDR		0	/* Memory load  */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_MEM_DATA		1
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_IO_ADDR		2	/* IO load      */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_IO_DATA		3
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_CFG_ADDR		4	/* Config load  */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_LD_CFG_DATA		5
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_MEM_ADDR		6	/* Memory store */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_MEM_DATA		7
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_IO_ADDR		8	/* IO store     */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_IO_DATA		9
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_CFG_ADDR		10	/* Config store */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_ST_CFG_DATA		11
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_RD_ADDR		12	/* DMA read     */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_RD_DATA		13
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_RD_MASTER	14
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_RD_TARGET	15
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_WR_ADDR		16	/* DMA write    */
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_WR_DATA		17
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_WR_MASTER	18
>> >> >> +#define  VFIO_EEH_ERR_FUNC_DMA_WR_TARGET	19
>> >> >
>> >> >These all seem to duplicate (under slightly different names) the
>> >> >defines you just added in arch/powerpc/include/asm/eeh.h.  It would
>> >> >make more sense to only have the uapi copy, surely.
>> >> >
>> >> 
>> >> David, Thanks for your time. The defines in eeh.h is used not only
>> >> for mapping those constants defined in vfio.h, but also for validating
>> >> arguments from debugfs entry "err_injct". So it'd better to keep
>> >> them separate: one set is used by userspace, another set is used
>> >> by host kernel.
>> >
>> >I don't understand why this is an argument for duplicating them.  They
>> >have the same meanings and values, why can't you use the uapi versions
>> >everywhere?
>> >
>> 
>> We can drop the constants defined in eeh.h and just use those defines
>> in vfio.h. But I prefer separate constants for some ovbious reasons
>> except the one I mentioned above :)
>> 
>> - We already had separate sets of constants for EEH and VFIO. For example,
>>   VFIO_EEH_PE_STATE_* in include/uapi/vfio.h always have counter part in
>>   arch/powerpc/asm/include/eeh.h
>
>Oh.. I see your point.
>
>Yes, the EEH internal code shouldn't need to use the VFIO defined
>constants.
>
>But it's still silly to duplicate, I think the correct think would be
>to expose the EEH constants in uapi, and use those for VFIO as well.
>

I'm not sure. If Alex.W agree on this, I can have one patch to address
it in future :-)

>> - The UAPI interface is expected to be stable, or back-compatible when
>>   introducing changes to it. The defines (at least their names) in eeh.h
>>   doesn't have to be stable.
>
>But is there any reason not to make them stable.  The VFIO case shows
>that we need to lock down an interface somewhere.  I don't see that
>there's an advantage to having a not locked down interface in addition
>to a locked down one.
>

I was saying that the UAPI interace should be stable. I don't see
there're any reasons the UAPI interface will be changed in near
future :)

Thanks,
Gavin

>> - I would like keep the code between EEH/VFIO independent to each other
>>   enough.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Gavin
>> 
>> >> By the way, Alex Williamson, could you please ACK this if you don't
>> >> find obvious errors in the patch. I really want this to be merged
>> >> to 4.1.
>> >> 
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Gavin 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >
>> 
>> 
>
>-- 
>David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
>david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
>				| _way_ _around_!
>http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux