Re: 2 CPU Conformance Issue in KVM/x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/03/2015 20:50, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> Is the issue emulating a higher MAXPHYADDR on the guest than is
>>> available on the host? I don't think there's any need to support that.
>> No, indeed.  The only problem is that the failure mode is quite horrible
>> (you get a triple fault, possibly while the guest is running).
> 
> Can't qemu simply check for it?

Yes.  But right now it doesn't even try to do something sensible with
MAXPHYADDR. :/

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux