On 5 March 2015 at 20:04, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 11:12:22AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 04/03/2015 18:28, Catalin Marinas wrote: >> >> > Can you add that property to the device tree for PCI devices too? >> > >> > Yes but not with mainline yet: >> > >> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.iommu/8935 >> > >> > We can add the property at the PCI host bridge level (with the drawback >> > that it covers all the PCI devices), like here: >> >> Even covering all PCI devices is not enough if we want to support device >> assignment of PCI host devices. > > Can we not have another PCI bridge node in the DT for the host device > assignments? I'd hate to have to do that. PCI should be entirely probeable given that we tell the guest where the host bridge is, that's one of its advantages. -- PMM -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
