Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: work around incoherency with uncached guest mappings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 04/03/2015 15:29, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> I disagree it is 100% a host-side issue. It is a host-side issue _if_
> the host tells the guest that the (virtual) device is non-coherent (or,
> more precisely, it does not explicitly tell the guest that the device is
> coherent). If the guest thinks the (virtual) device is non-coherent
> because of information passed by the host, I fully agree that the host
> needs to manage the cache coherency.
> 
> However, the host could also pass a "dma-coherent" property in the DT
> given to the guest and avoid any form of cache maintenance. If the guest
> does not honour such coherency property, it's a guest problem and it
> needs fixing in the guest. This isn't any different from a real physical
> device behaviour.

Can you add that property to the device tree for PCI devices too?

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux