On Thursday 05 March 2009 03:41:41 Chris Wright wrote: > * Marcelo Tosatti (mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Please do not special case irq 0. The fact that only x86/IA64 are > > supported at the moment does not mean other architectures can't > > use it. > > Seems logical to use a flag instead of overloading the irq value. > > > Also, the kernel code to handle dev/irq assignment is quite messy. It > > should be only a mechanism, with userspace controlling the policy. > > I really agree here. I think some work to simplify/clarify would be > time well-spent! So do I... After discussion with Marcelo, I would work with him on this clean up. :) -- regards Yang, Sheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
