* Marcelo Tosatti (mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Please do not special case irq 0. The fact that only x86/IA64 are > supported at the moment does not mean other architectures can't > use it. Seems logical to use a flag instead of overloading the irq value. > Also, the kernel code to handle dev/irq assignment is quite messy. It > should be only a mechanism, with userspace controlling the policy. I really agree here. I think some work to simplify/clarify would be time well-spent! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
