On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:06:44AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > On 27/01/15 08:35, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> On 27.01.15 at 02:51, <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Even if David told you this would be acceptable, I have to question > > an abstract model of fixing issues on only 64-bit kernels - this may > > be acceptable for distro purposes, but seems hardly the right > > approach for upstream. If 32-bit ones are to become deliberately > > broken, the XEN config option should become dependent on !X86_32. > > I'd rather have something omitted (keeping the current behaviour) than > something that has not been tested at all. > > Obviously it would be preferable to to fix both 32-bit and 64-bit x86 > (and ARM as well) but I'm not going to block an important bug fix for > the majority use case (64-bit x86). The hunk for 32-bit should indeed only go in once we get a Tested-by. Please let me know if there is anything else needed for this patch. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
