On 27/01/15 08:35, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 27.01.15 at 02:51, <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Even if David told you this would be acceptable, I have to question > an abstract model of fixing issues on only 64-bit kernels - this may > be acceptable for distro purposes, but seems hardly the right > approach for upstream. If 32-bit ones are to become deliberately > broken, the XEN config option should become dependent on !X86_32. I'd rather have something omitted (keeping the current behaviour) than something that has not been tested at all. Obviously it would be preferable to to fix both 32-bit and 64-bit x86 (and ARM as well) but I'm not going to block an important bug fix for the majority use case (64-bit x86). David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
