Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] ARM64: KVM: PMU infrastructure support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (dropping previous conversation for easy reading)
>
> Hi Marc/Christoffer,
>
> I tried implementing PMU context-switch via C code
> in EL1 mode and in atomic context with irqs disabled.
> The context switch itself works perfectly fine but
> irq forwarding is not clean for PMU irq.
>
> I found another issue that is GIC only samples irq
> lines if they are enabled. This means for using
> irq forwarding we will need to ensure that host PMU
> irq is enabled.  The arch_timer code does this by
> doing request_irq() for host virtual timer interrupt.
> For PMU, we can either enable/disable host PMU
> irq in context switch or we need to do have shared
> irq handler between kvm pmu and host kernel pmu.
>
> I have rethinked about our discussion so far. I
> understand that we need KVM PMU virtualization
> to meet following criteria:
> 1. No modification in host PMU driver
> 2. No modification in guest PMU driver
> 3. No mask/unmask dance for sharing host PMU irq
> 4. Clean way to avoid infinite VM exits due to
> PMU interrupt
>
> I have discovered new approach which is as follows:
> 1. Context switch PMU in atomic context (i.e. local_irq_disable())
> 2. Ensure that host PMU irq is disabled when entering guest
> mode and re-enable host PMU irq when exiting guest mode if
> it was enabled previously. This is to avoid infinite VM exits
> due to PMU interrupt because as-per new approach we
> don't mask the PMU irq via PMINTENSET_EL1 register.
> 3. Inject virtual PMU irq at time of entering guest mode if PMU
> overflow register is non-zero (i.e. PMOVSSET_EL0) in atomic
> context (i.e. local_irq_disable()).
>
> The only limitation of this new approach is that virtual PMU irq
> is injected at time of entering guest mode. This means guest
> will receive virtual PMU  interrupt with little delay after actual
> interrupt occurred. The PMU interrupts are only overflow events
> and generally not used in any timing critical applications. If we
> can live with this limitation then this can be a good approach
> for KVM PMU virtualization.
>
> Regards,
> Anup

Hi Marc/Christoffer,

Ping??

Regards,
Anup
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux