Re: Benchmarking for vhost polling patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> > Hi Michael,
>> > 
>> > Following the polling patch thread: http://marc.info/?
>> l=kvm&m=140853271510179&w=2, 
>> > I changed poll_stop_idle to be counted in micro seconds, and carried 
>out 
>> > experiments using varying sizes of this value. The setup for 
>> netperf consisted of 
>> > 1 vm and 1 vhost , each running on their own dedicated core.
>> > 
>> Could you provide your changing code?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Zhang Haoyu
>> 
>Hi Zhang,
>Do you mean the change in code for poll_stop_idle?
Yes, it's better to provide the complete code, including the polling patch.

Thanks,
Zhang Haoyu
>Thanks,
>Razya

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux