Re: Benchmarking for vhost polling patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Zhang Haoyu" <zhanghy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 30/10/2014 01:30:08 PM:

> From: "Zhang Haoyu" <zhanghy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, "mst" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, "kvm" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 30/10/2014 01:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Benchmarking for vhost polling patch
> 
> > Hi Michael,
> > 
> > Following the polling patch thread: http://marc.info/?
> l=kvm&m=140853271510179&w=2, 
> > I changed poll_stop_idle to be counted in micro seconds, and carried 
out 
> > experiments using varying sizes of this value. The setup for 
> netperf consisted of 
> > 1 vm and 1 vhost , each running on their own dedicated core.
> > 
> Could you provide your changing code?
> 
> Thanks,
> Zhang Haoyu
> 
Hi Zhang,
Do you mean the change in code for poll_stop_idle?
Thanks,
Razya

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux