Hi Radim, On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 06:50:03PM +0200, Radim Krčmář wrote: >2014-08-21 18:30+0200, Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 21/08/2014 18:08, Radim Krčmář ha scritto: >> I'm not sure of the usefulness of patch 6, so I'm going to drop it. >> I'll keep it in my local junkyard branch in case it's going to be useful >> in some scenario I didn't think of. > >I've been using it to benchmark different values, because it is more Is there any benchmark data for this patchset? Regards, Wanpeng Li >convenient than reloading the module after shutting down guests. >(And easier to sell than writing to kernel memory.) > >I don't think the additional code is worth it though. > >> Patch 7 can be easily rebased, so no need to repost (and I might even >> squash it into patch 3, what do you think?). > >Yeah, the core is already a huge patch, so it does look weird without >squashing. (No-one wants to rebase to that point anyway.) > >Thanks. >-- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
