Il 21/08/2014 18:50, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
> 2014-08-21 18:30+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
>> Il 21/08/2014 18:08, Radim Krčmář ha scritto:
>> I'm not sure of the usefulness of patch 6, so I'm going to drop it.
>> I'll keep it in my local junkyard branch in case it's going to be useful
>> in some scenario I didn't think of.
>
> I've been using it to benchmark different values, because it is more
> convenient than reloading the module after shutting down guests.
> (And easier to sell than writing to kernel memory.)
>
> I don't think the additional code is worth it though.
>
>> Patch 7 can be easily rebased, so no need to repost (and I might even
>> squash it into patch 3, what do you think?).
>
> Yeah, the core is already a huge patch, so it does look weird without
> squashing. (No-one wants to rebase to that point anyway.)
Ok, my queue is a bit large so I'll probably not push to git.kernel.org
until next week but in any case this is what it will look like:
Radim Krčmář (5):
KVM: add kvm_arch_sched_in
KVM: x86: introduce sched_in to kvm_x86_ops
KVM: VMX: make PLE window per-VCPU <<< ple_window_dirty squashed here
KVM: VMX: dynamise PLE window
KVM: trace kvm_ple_window grow/shrink
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
