On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:10:19PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 1 July 2014 18:03, Stefano Stabellini > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> How about: > >> ===== > >> Guest OSes in the VM image should rely on the UEFI RTC API for > >> real time clock services. (To provide that API, the VM system will > >> likely need to implement some real time clock device, but the > >> details of these are a private implementation issue between it > >> and its associated UEFI implementation.) > > > > I don't see why we need to add the text within brackets: it is out of > > scope for this document. > > The intention is to be an informative note, not normative text > (I'm happy if we want to format the text to make that clearer, > with some sort of NOTE: markup). I'd like VM implementors > reading this spec to make the correct decisions even if they > don't happen to know inside-out the details of the UEFI > specification and what exactly UEFI demands of the hardware, > and I think it's worth adding the occasional clarifying sentence > even if it doesn't strictly speaking add any extra rules to the > specification. > That's also the approach we've taken so far elsewhere in the document, so I think it's useful. -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
