Re: [PATCH 08/11] qspinlock: Revert to test-and-set on hypervisors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/15/2014 08:47 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
When we detect a hypervisor (!paravirt, see later patches), revert to
a simple test-and-set lock to avoid the horrors of queue preemption.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra<peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h |   14 ++++++++++++++
  include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h  |    7 +++++++
  kernel/locking/qspinlock.c       |    3 +++
  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
  #ifndef _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H
  #define _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H

+#include<asm/cpufeature.h>
  #include<asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>

  #if !defined(CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE)&&  !defined(CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE)
@@ -20,6 +21,19 @@ static inline void queue_spin_unlock(str

  #endif /* !CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE&&  !CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE */

+#define virt_queue_spin_lock virt_queue_spin_lock
+
+static inline bool virt_queue_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
+		return false;
+
+	while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0)
+		cpu_relax();
+
+	return true;
+}
+
  #include<asm-generic/qspinlock.h>

  #endif /* _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H */
--- a/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h
@@ -98,6 +98,13 @@ static __always_inline void queue_spin_u
  }
  #endif

+#ifndef virt_queue_spin_lock
+static __always_inline bool virt_queue_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+#endif
+
  /*
   * Initializier
   */
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qsp

  	BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_NR_CPUS>= (1U<<  _Q_TAIL_CPU_BITS));

+	if (virt_queue_spin_lock(lock))
+		return;
+
  	/*
  	 * wait for in-progress pending->locked hand-overs
  	 *

I just wonder if it is better to allow the kernel distributors to decide if unfair lock should be the default for virtual guest. Anyway, I have no objection to that myself.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux