On 01.02.2009, at 01:55, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
On 31.01.2009, at 22:08, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Why not rather do
Platform: native
Some architectures may find the use of "native" to describe the
absence of a hypervisor as being somewhat offensive. I can think of
two particular architectures where the "native" configuration
includes a hypervisor :-)
Then expose them as such ;). It's not like you couldn't do
Platform: z/vm
Right?
So this does make sense for everyone, no?
Alex
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
