Il 22/04/2014 21:31, Bandan Das ha scritto:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Il 22/04/2014 12:25, Bandan Das ha scritto:
+ if (j < i)
+ shadow_read_write_fields[j] =
+ shadow_read_write_fields[i];
+ j++;
... you need to respin anyway because the j++ is wrong. It should be
inside the "if". If you prefer, you can put it in the lhs of the
j++ outside the "if" looks right to me. Can you please explain why
you think it shouldn't be that way ?
The way you wrote it, j will always be equal to i.
Right, and that's what we want unless we come across an unsupported
field. We then overwrite the unsupported field with the next
field supported. j this way keeps track of the "real" length.
Doh, brain fart.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
