Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: Check for host supported fields in shadow vmcs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Il 21/04/2014 15:20, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>> +	for (i = j = 0; i < max_shadow_read_write_fields; i++) {
>> +
>
> Extra empty line.  Not a big deal, but...
>
>> +		switch (shadow_read_write_fields[i]) {
>> +		case GUEST_BNDCFGS:
>> +			if (!vmx_mpx_supported())
>> +				continue;
>> +			break;
>> +		default:
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (j < i)
>> +			shadow_read_write_fields[j] =
>> +				shadow_read_write_fields[i];
>> +		j++;
>
> ... you need to respin anyway because the j++ is wrong.  It should be
> inside the "if".  If you prefer, you can put it in the lhs of the

j++ outside the "if" looks right to me. Can you please explain why
you think it shouldn't be that way ?

> assignment, otherwise a separate statement is fine by me too.
>
> Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux