Start with Linaro publishing it. It can always be moved to another venue if someone dislikes Linaro having maintainership. g. On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Michael Casadevall <michael.casadevall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 04/01/2014 05:49 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 10:26 -0700, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> However, that may be a pain to update >> >> Very much, and there would be nothing worse than having multiple >> divergent copies of the spec. >> >>> so the preferred method could be to host it in either its current >>> form (clear-text) or publish some versioned PDF somewhere and >>> simply point to it from the compliant software pieces. >> >> I think that would be best. >> >> I'm at a loss to suggest a suitable neutral home though I'm >> afraid. >> > > I agree with formal PDF (or TeX/plain text) releases + versioning; > something I can print out and hit people with always works great for > spec compliance. > > On the topic of hosting, if Linaro itself isn't neutral enough, what > about under the Linux Foundation? They already host a bunch of > standards like the FHS. > Michael > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTOo2JAAoJEGKVRgSEnX1Qu+gH/ja+aqOqc04gbpFvuarHtzeM > nLtJ1ie4JKOJTVqqQz+lgPhx+r3H9PrMFZnGvzs8H6GYSaU66i/SHKU150J1Ig5M > 1w4DYqQj7DEClpoNmpPZVJJbevp70/wDH1wFSJZXJmxV9yOpMtrNZXwB60KANP2f > MJDF+iDLIkv8vRPYQJEmuV4PMcJQs88X91eEb67jChX1ntMiiDAFSM6t2cRyfVG0 > la4Ujk/p/u+Kr43wbhQITOKXZpWCtI8gjp7wTuZc+EDIhmufd5uiQ2VyTZaMkPkV > xuX9871Y8VHGxCkAmhHPODbp3Wd4VUP2ewOYnTRYR2IIRpa4gNNLUa+MSdrL/sU= > =2ub7 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
