On 02/07/2014 07:32 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 07/02/2014 14:07, Andrey Korolyov ha scritto:
>> Ok, I will do, but looks like libvirt version(1.0.2) in not relevant -
>> it meets criteria set by debian packagers
>
> Then Debian's qemu packaging it's wrong, QEMU 1.6 or newer should conflict
> with libvirt <1.2.0.
>
>> and again, 'broken state' is
>> not relevant to the libvirt state history, it more likely to be qemu/kvm
>> problem.
>
> It is relevant, qemu introduced a new migration status before "active"
> ("setup") and libvirt doesn't recognize it. That's why you need at
> least 1.2.0.
>
> Paolo
>
Thanks, both issues - with reverted CPU dependency and with migration
itself went away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
