On Thu, 6 Feb 2014 18:39:30 +0100 Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 06.02.2014, at 17:36, Greg Kurz <gkurz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > As discussed in this thread: > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/309166/ > > > > We need some consistency in the way we check whether the guest > > should resume or not because: > > - new RESUME_GUEST_XXX values may show up > > - more locations in KVM may need to perform a similar check > > > > This serie introduces a helper and patches the locations where it > > should be called. There is yet another location in __kvmppc_vcpu_run, > > but it is assembly and cannot call a C inlined function. > > Thanks, applied all to kvm-ppc-queue. I think the splitting on this one > is quite excessive - a single patch would've done :). > > > Alex > Heh... I paranoid ! :) Thanks Alex ! -- Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
