On 06.02.2014, at 17:36, Greg Kurz <gkurz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As discussed in this thread: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/309166/ > > We need some consistency in the way we check whether the guest > should resume or not because: > - new RESUME_GUEST_XXX values may show up > - more locations in KVM may need to perform a similar check > > This serie introduces a helper and patches the locations where it > should be called. There is yet another location in __kvmppc_vcpu_run, > but it is assembly and cannot call a C inlined function. Thanks, applied all to kvm-ppc-queue. I think the splitting on this one is quite excessive - a single patch would've done :). Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
