On 21.04.2013, at 12:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:26:08PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> The concept of an irqfd and interrupt routing are nothing particularly tied >> into the IOAPIC implementation. In fact, most of the code already is perfectly >> generic. >> >> This patch set decouples most bits of the existing irqchip and irqfd >> implementation to make it reusable for non-IOAPIC platforms, like the PPC MPIC. >> >> I also have a patch that implements working irqfd support on top of these, >> but that requires the in-kernel MPIC implementation to go upstream first, so >> I'm holding off on it until we settled everything there, so the concept >> certainly does work. >> >> Alex > > Nothing to object to here really, this is just > moving code around. > And patches 3 and 4 are definitely cleanups. > Assuming this helps PPC gain in-kernel irqchip support: > > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> Could you please check the newer version of this patch set again and give your ack if it still holds? http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg06214.html Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
