On 25.04.2013, at 09:28, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:20:31PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:26:08PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> The concept of an irqfd and interrupt routing are nothing particularly tied >>> into the IOAPIC implementation. In fact, most of the code already is perfectly >>> generic. >>> >>> This patch set decouples most bits of the existing irqchip and irqfd >>> implementation to make it reusable for non-IOAPIC platforms, like the PPC MPIC. >>> >>> I also have a patch that implements working irqfd support on top of these, >>> but that requires the in-kernel MPIC implementation to go upstream first, so >>> I'm holding off on it until we settled everything there, so the concept >>> certainly does work. >>> >>> Alex >>> >> Nice cleanup, thanks! Should expect a new series with "ifdef >> kvm_irqchip" and ia64 compilation fixed. The fixes are minor enough for >> me to fix them while applying. >> > Actually the series does not apply any more and has to be rebased on top of the > current queue. Heh, we're already at v3: http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm-ppc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg06214.html Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
