On 07/28/2009 02:43 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:04 -0700, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
The way I've done this in the past is to get acks from PPC
maintainers,
and then push the patches through Avi.
If a "generic" PPC patch is required by a KVM patch, pushing them
through different trees would leave KVM broken for weeks until it all
ends up merged in Linus's tree.
Despite Ben's newfound interest in KVM, I don't see a good reason to
change this model. :)
Depends how invasive the powerpc bits are. I'll figure something out.
Yes. If they are invasive, the best way is to carry the non-kvm changes
in both trees, and for me to push after you (I'll omit the duplicates
when pushing).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
