On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 06:46:29PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi Scott, > I just discussed with Hollis about shadow tlb management in the > hypervisor and he mentioned that you already have a patch that lets the > guest use more tlb entries than it would have on bare metal hardware and > therefore allow to handle more tlb misses in the host because the shadow > tlb already holds that information. > > It would be nice if you could provide me and the kvmppc community that > patch, because I wanted to modify our tlb handling a bit. If it would be > easy enough I would like to test that with a different number of guest > tlb entries too to see how big the impact of such a change would be to > our shadow tlb management. It's not a patch to KVM, it's something I've done on Freescale's hypervisor (which isn't released yet). -Scott -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ppc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
