On 04/23/2010 02:14 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
Do you have performance numbers? I'm interested in both measurements of
KVM_SWITCH_DIRTY_LOG under various conditions and macro benchmarks (for
example, total guest throughput improvement under Kemari).
Currently, I'm just checking the performance visually.
- on laptops, we can feel the speed directly: my favorite is installing
ubuntu or debian by alternate installers
- live migration with heavy work load
Now that I've got the overall design, I want to measure the
performance by numbers.
About performance under Kemari: we(oss.ntt.co.jp staffs: me and
Fernando) are
now concentrating on improving the basic live-migration
infrastructures and
they(lab.ntt.co.jp staffs) are working hard for building Kemari itself.
- We are also interested in using live-migration with HA software
and this needs
light, stable live-migration: same as Kemari!
General live migration improvements are also interesting, I just the
improvement would be more pronounced under Kemari. Looking forward to
seeing the results.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
