(2010/04/23 19:28), Avi Kivity wrote:
OK, I will do in the next version. In this RFC, I would be happy if I can
know the overall design is right or not.
Everything looks reasonable to me.
Thank you!
Do you have performance numbers? I'm interested in both measurements of
KVM_SWITCH_DIRTY_LOG under various conditions and macro benchmarks (for
example, total guest throughput improvement under Kemari).
Currently, I'm just checking the performance visually.
- on laptops, we can feel the speed directly: my favorite is installing
ubuntu or debian by alternate installers
- live migration with heavy work load
Now that I've got the overall design, I want to measure the performance by numbers.
About performance under Kemari: we(oss.ntt.co.jp staffs: me and Fernando) are
now concentrating on improving the basic live-migration infrastructures and
they(lab.ntt.co.jp staffs) are working hard for building Kemari itself.
- We are also interested in using live-migration with HA software and this needs
light, stable live-migration: same as Kemari!
So measuring Kemari's performance with our patch-set will need some more time,
** How about Tamura-san? **
So at this stage, I'll show you performance improvement(I hope to improve) by
another test cases.
If possible next week!
Thanks,
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
