On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jes Sorensen wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Trying to get rid of the static declaration of the vcpu_info array, this >> patch folds it into CPUState. I have only been able to test it on ia64, >> but it seems to behave as expect, however ia64 SMP support is still a >> bit flakey, so I would appreciate it if someone would test this on x86 >> and PPC. It builds on x86_64 at least. >> >> Comments appreciated. > > Looks reasonable to me. Glommer, please review this as well. Does this > help or interfere with your efforts? I am travelling this week, and will only be able to provide an extensible review in a few days. However, me and Jes have already discussed, and it seem to get along fine with what I am doing. It makes sense for the accelerator to be able to register an opaque of its own in cpu state, so I will be working on a patch for exactly that shortly > > -- > error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Glauber Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
