Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 10:49 AM Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 10:55:07AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > @@ -515,6 +516,8 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
>> > * truncated accordingly on 32 bit architectures.
>> > */
>> > __u64 sig_data;
>> > +
>> > + __u64 config3; /* extension of config2 */
>>
>> I need an ack from the perf core maintainers before I can take this.
>
> Peter, Arnaldo, Ingo,
>
> Can I get an ack on this please.
It appears that PMUs that don't use config{1,2} and now config3 allow
them to be whatever without any validation, whereas in reality we should
probably -EINVAL in those cases. Should something be done about that?
Regards,
--
Alex
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
