On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 10:55:07AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Arm SPEv1.2 adds another 64-bits of event filtering control. As the
> existing perf_event_attr::configN fields are all used up for SPE PMU, an
> additional field is needed. Add a new 'config3' field.
>
> Tested-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v3:
> - No change
> v2:
> - Drop tools/ side update
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 85be78e0e7f6..b2b1d7b54097 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ enum perf_event_read_format {
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER5 112 /* add: aux_watermark */
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER6 120 /* add: aux_sample_size */
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER7 128 /* add: sig_data */
> +#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER8 136 /* add: config3 */
>
> /*
> * Hardware event_id to monitor via a performance monitoring event:
> @@ -515,6 +516,8 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
> * truncated accordingly on 32 bit architectures.
> */
> __u64 sig_data;
> +
> + __u64 config3; /* extension of config2 */
I need an ack from the perf core maintainers before I can take this.
Will
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
