On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 07:27:27AM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 03:08:49AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > I'm not crazy about this sort of parameters. I think it would make a > > lot more sense to pass a pointer to the walker structure and do the > > flag check inside the helper. > > > > That way, we avoid extra churn if/when we need extra state or > > bookkeeping around the walk. > > Sure, let's go that way instead. v3 on the way lol :) Well, going this route is going to require hoisting around a few things. I'd very much prefer to keep the RCU indirection ifdeffery all in one place, but I'll need to haul it all after the definitions of kvm_pgtable_walker and kvm_pgtable_walk_flags but before the definition of kvm_pgtable (as it needs kvm_pteref_t). I'm not too bothered by it, but not quite as small of a bandaid this time around. -- Thanks, Oliver _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
