On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 07:22:49PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:22:47PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > In order to service stage-2 faults in parallel, stage-2 table walkers
> > must take exclusive ownership of the PTE being worked on. An additional
> > requirement of the architecture is that software must perform a
> > 'break-before-make' operation when changing the block size used for
> > mapping memory.
> >
> > Roll these two concepts together into helpers for performing a
> > 'break-before-make' sequence. Use a special PTE value to indicate a PTE
> > has been locked by a software walker. Additionally, use an atomic
> > compare-exchange to 'break' the PTE when the stage-2 page tables are
> > possibly shared with another software walker. Elide the DSB + TLBI if
> > the evicted PTE was invalid (and thus not subject to break-before-make).
> >
> > All of the atomics do nothing for now, as the stage-2 walker isn't fully
> > ready to perform parallel walks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > index 4c579b3beabf..1df858c21b2e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@
> > #define KVM_INVALID_PTE_OWNER_MASK GENMASK(9, 2)
> > #define KVM_MAX_OWNER_ID 1
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Used to indicate a pte for which a 'break-before-make' sequence is in
> > + * progress.
> > + */
> > +#define KVM_INVALID_PTE_LOCKED BIT(10)
> > +
> > struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data {
> > struct kvm_pgtable_walker *walker;
> >
> > @@ -674,6 +680,11 @@ static bool stage2_pte_is_counted(kvm_pte_t pte)
> > return !!pte;
> > }
> >
> > +static bool stage2_pte_is_locked(kvm_pte_t pte)
> > +{
> > + return !kvm_pte_valid(pte) && (pte & KVM_INVALID_PTE_LOCKED);
> > +}
> > +
> > static bool stage2_try_set_pte(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx, kvm_pte_t new)
> > {
> > if (!kvm_pgtable_walk_shared(ctx)) {
> > @@ -684,6 +695,64 @@ static bool stage2_try_set_pte(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx, kvm_pte_
> > return cmpxchg(ctx->ptep, ctx->old, new) == ctx->old;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * stage2_try_break_pte() - Invalidates a pte according to the
> > + * 'break-before-make' requirements of the
> > + * architecture.
> > + *
> > + * @ctx: context of the visited pte.
> > + * @data: stage-2 map data
> > + *
> > + * Returns: true if the pte was successfully broken.
> > + *
> > + * If the removed pte was valid, performs the necessary serialization and TLB
> > + * invalidation for the old value. For counted ptes, drops the reference count
> > + * on the containing table page.
> > + */
> > +static bool stage2_try_break_pte(const struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx *ctx,
> > + struct stage2_map_data *data)
>
> Would it be possible to pass "kvm_s2_mmu *mmu" directly (instead of
> "stage2_map_data *data")? so this function can be reused by other
> walkers.
Sure, and I presume the ask is coming because you're layering eager page
splitting on top of this right? :-)
> Another option would be to stash "struct kvm_s2_mmu" in
> "struct kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx".
I don't think we'd want to do that. kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx is shared
amongst all walkers, including the hypervisor stage-1.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
