On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 9:22 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> > Currently make_huge_page_split_spte() assumes execute permissions can be
> > granted to any 4K SPTE when splitting huge pages. This is true for the
> > TDP MMU but is not necessarily true for the shadow MMU, since KVM may be
> > shadowing a non-executable huge page.
> >
> > To fix this, pass in the child shadow page where the huge page will be
> > split and derive the execution permission from the shadow page's role.
> > This is correct because huge pages are always split with direct shadow
> > page and thus the shadow page role contains the correct access
> > permissions.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 13 +++++++------
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> > index 4739b53c9734..9db98fbeee61 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> > @@ -215,10 +215,11 @@ static u64 make_spte_executable(u64 spte)
> > * This is used during huge page splitting to build the SPTEs that make up the
> > * new page table.
> > */
> > -u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, int huge_level, int index)
> > +u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index)
>
> Rather than pass in @sp, what about passing in @role? Then the need for
> exec_allowed and child_level goes away (for whatever reason I reacted to the
> "allowed" part of exec_allowed).
I like it! Will do.
>
> E.g.
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 11 +++++------
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> index 9db98fbeee61..1b766e381727 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
> @@ -215,10 +215,9 @@ static u64 make_spte_executable(u64 spte)
> * This is used during huge page splitting to build the SPTEs that make up the
> * new page table.
> */
> -u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index)
> +u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, union kvm_mmu_page_role role,
> + int index)
> {
> - bool exec_allowed = sp->role.access & ACC_EXEC_MASK;
> - int child_level = sp->role.level;
> u64 child_spte;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(huge_spte)))
> @@ -234,9 +233,9 @@ u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index)
> * split. So we just have to OR in the offset to the page at the next
> * lower level for the given index.
> */
> - child_spte |= (index * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(child_level)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + child_spte |= (index * KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(role.level)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> - if (child_level == PG_LEVEL_4K) {
> + if (role.level == PG_LEVEL_4K) {
> child_spte &= ~PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
>
> /*
> @@ -244,7 +243,7 @@ u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index)
> * the page executable as the NX hugepage mitigation no longer
> * applies.
> */
> - if (exec_allowed && is_nx_huge_page_enabled())
> + if ((role.access & ACC_EXEC_MASK) && is_nx_huge_page_enabled())
> child_spte = make_spte_executable(child_spte);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> index 921ea77f1b5e..80d36d0d9def 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
> @@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
> u64 old_spte, bool prefetch, bool can_unsync,
> bool host_writable, u64 *new_spte);
> -u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index);
> +u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, union kvm_mmu_page_role role,
> + int index);
> u64 make_nonleaf_spte(u64 *child_pt, bool ad_disabled);
> u64 make_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn, unsigned int access);
> u64 mark_spte_for_access_track(u64 spte);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> index 110a34ca41c2..c4c4bad69f38 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
> @@ -1469,7 +1469,7 @@ static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
> * not been linked in yet and thus is not reachable from any other CPU.
> */
> for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++)
> - sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(huge_spte, sp, i);
> + sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(huge_spte, sp->role, i);
>
> /*
> * Replace the huge spte with a pointer to the populated lower level
>
> base-commit: 721828e2397ab854b536de3ea10a9bc7962091a9
> --
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
