This series extends KVM's Eager Page Splitting to also split huge pages mapped by the shadow MMU, specifically **nested MMUs**. For background on Eager Page Splitting, see: - Proposal: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/CALzav=dV_U4r1K9oDq4esb4mpBQDQ2ROQ5zH5wV3KpOaZrRW-A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ - TDP MMU support: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220119230739.2234394-1-dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx/ Splitting huge pages mapped by the shadow MMU is more complicated than the TDP MMU, but it is also more important for performance as the shadow MMU handles huge page write-protection faults under the write lock. See the Performance section for more details. The extra complexity of splitting huge pages mapped by the shadow MMU comes from a few places: (1) The shadow MMU has a limit on the number of shadow pages that are allowed to be allocated. So, as a policy, Eager Page Splitting refuses to split if there are KVM_MIN_FREE_MMU_PAGES or fewer pages available. (2) Huge pages may be mapped by indirect shadow pages which may have access permission constraints from the guest (unlike the TDP MMU which is ACC_ALL by default). (3) Splitting a huge page may end up re-using an existing lower level shadow page tables. This is unlike the TDP MMU which always allocates new shadow page tables when splitting. (4) When installing the lower level SPTEs, they must be added to the rmap which may require allocating additional pte_list_desc structs. In Google's internal implementation of Eager Page Splitting, we do not handle cases (3) and (4), and intstead opts to skip splitting entirely (case 3) or only partially splitting (case 4). This series handles the additional cases, which requires an additional 4KiB of memory per VM to store the extra pte_list_desc cache. However it does also avoids the need for TLB flushes in most cases and allows KVM to split more pages mapped by shadow paging. The bulk of this series is just refactoring the existing MMU code in preparation for splitting, specifically to make it possible to operate on the MMU outside of a vCPU context. Motivation ---------- During dirty logging, VMs using the shadow MMU suffer from: (1) Write-protection faults on huge pages that take the MMU lock to unmap the huge page, map a 4KiB page, and update the dirty log. (2) Non-present faults caused by (1) that take the MMU lock to map in the missing page. (3) Write-protection faults on 4KiB pages that take the MMU lock to make the page writable and update the dirty log. [Note: These faults only take the MMU lock during shadow paging.] The lock contention from (1), (2) and (3) can severely degrade application performance to the point of failure. Eager page splitting eliminates (1) by moving the splitting of huge pages off the vCPU threads onto the thread invoking VM-ioctls to configure dirty logging, and eliminates (2) by fully splitting each huge page into its constituent small pages. (3) is still a concern for shadow paging workloads (e.g. nested virtualization) but is not addressed by this series. Splitting in the VM-ioctl thread is useful because it can run in the background without interrupting vCPU execution. However, it does take the MMU lock so it may introduce some extra contention if vCPUs are hammering the MMU lock. This is offset by the fact that eager page splitting drops the MMU lock after splitting each SPTE if there is any contention, and the fact that eager page splitting is reducing the MMU lock contention from (1) and (2) above. Even workloads that only write to 5% of their memory see massive MMU lock contention reduction during dirty logging thanks to Eager Page Splitting (see Performance data below). A downside of Eager Page Splitting is that it splits all huge pages, which may include ranges of memory that are never written to by the guest and thus could theoretically stay huge. Workloads that write to only a fraction of their memory may see higher TLB miss costs with Eager Page Splitting enabled. However, that is secondary to the application failure that otherwise may occur without Eager Page Splitting. Further work is necessary to improve the TLB miss performance for read-heavy workoads, such as dirty logging at 2M instead of 4K. Performance ----------- To measure the performance impact of Eager Page Splitting I ran dirty_log_perf_test with support for a new flag, -n, that causes each vCPU thread to run in L2 instead of L1. This support will be sent out in a separate series. To measure the imapct of customer performance, we can look at the time it takes all vCPUs to dirty memory after dirty logging has been enabled. Without Eager Page Splitting enabled, such dirtying must take faults to split huge pages and bottleneck on the MMU lock. For write-heavy workloads, there is not as much benefit since nested MMUs still have to take the write-lock when resolving 4K write-protection faults (case (3) in the Motivation section). But ready-heavy workloads greatly benefit. | Config: tdp_mmu=Y, nested, 100% writes | | Iteration 1 dirty memory time | | ------------------------------------------------------- | vCPU Count | eager_page_split=N | eager_page_split=Y | ------------ | -------------------------- | -------------------------- | 2 | 0.367445635s | 0.359880160s | 4 | 0.503976497s | 0.418760595s | 8 | 1.328792652s | 1.442455382s | 16 | 4.609457301s | 3.649754574s | 32 | 8.751328485s | 7.659014140s | 64 | 20.438482174s | 17.890019577s | | Config: tdp_mmu=Y, nested, 50% writes | | Iteration 1 dirty memory time | | ------------------------------------------------------- | vCPU Count | eager_page_split=N | eager_page_split=Y | ------------ | -------------------------- | -------------------------- | 2 | 0.374082549s | 0.189881327s | 4 | 0.498175012s | 0.216221200s | 8 | 1.848155856s | 0.525316794s | 16 | 4.387725630s | 1.844867390s | 32 | 9.153260046s | 4.061645844s | 64 | 20.077600588s | 8.825413269s | | Config: tdp_mmu=Y, nested, 5% writes | | Iteration 1 dirty memory time | | ------------------------------------------------------- | vCPU Count | eager_page_split=N | eager_page_split=Y | ------------ | -------------------------- | -------------------------- | 2 | 0.386395635s | 0.023315599s | 4 | 0.495352933s | 0.024971794s | 8 | 1.568730321s | 0.052010563s | 16 | 4.258323166s | 0.174402708s | 32 | 9.260176347s | 0.377929203s | 64 | 19.861473882s | 0.905998574s | Eager Page Splitting does increase the time it takes to enable dirty logging when not using initially-all-set, since that's when KVM splits huge pages. However, this runs in parallel with vCPU execution and drops the MMU lock whenever there is contention. | Config: tdp_mmu=Y, nested, 100% writes | | Enabling dirty logging time | | ------------------------------------------------------- | vCPU Count | eager_page_split=N | eager_page_split=Y | ------------ | -------------------------- | -------------------------- | 2 | 0.001330088s | 0.018624938s | 4 | 0.002763111s | 0.037247815s | 8 | 0.005220762s | 0.074637543s | 16 | 0.010381925s | 0.149096917s | 32 | 0.022109466s | 0.307983859s | 64 | 0.085547182s | 0.854228170s | Similarly, Eager Page Splitting increases the time it takes to clear the dirty log for when using initially-all-set. The first time userspace clears the dirty log, KVM will split huge pages: | Config: tdp_mmu=Y, nested, 100% writes initially-all-set | | Iteration 1 clear dirty log time | | ------------------------------------------------------- | vCPU Count | eager_page_split=N | eager_page_split=Y | ------------ | -------------------------- | -------------------------- | 2 | 0.001947098s | 0.019836052s | 4 | 0.003817996s | 0.039574178s | 8 | 0.007673616s | 0.079118964s | 16 | 0.015733003s | 0.158006697s | 32 | 0.031728367s | 0.330793049s | 64 | 0.108699714s | 0.891762988s | Subsequent calls to clear the dirty log incur almost no additional cost since KVM can very quickly determine there are no more huge pages to split via the RMAP. This is unlike the TDP MMU which must re-traverse the entire page table to check for huge pages. | Config: tdp_mmu=Y, nested, 100% writes initially-all-set | | Iteration 2 clear dirty log time | | ------------------------------------------------------- | vCPU Count | eager_page_split=N | eager_page_split=Y | ------------ | -------------------------- | -------------------------- | 2 | 0.009585296s | 0.009931437s | 4 | 0.019188984s | 0.019842738s | 8 | 0.038568630s | 0.039951832s | 16 | 0.077188525s | 0.079536780s | 32 | 0.156728329s | 0.163612725s | 64 | 0.418679324s | 0.337336844s | Testing ------- - Ran all kvm-unit-tests and KVM selftests. - Booted a 32-bit non-PAE kernel with shadow paging to verify the quadrant change. - Ran dirty_log_perf_test with support for a new flag, -n, that causes each vCPU thread to run in L2 instead of L1. This support will be sent out in a separate series. - Tested VM live migration with nested MMUs and huge pages. The live migration setup consisted of an 8 vCPU 8 GiB VM running on an Intel Cascade Lake host and backed by 1GiB HugeTLBFS memory. The VM was running Debian 10. Inside a VM was a 6 vCPU 4Gib nested VM also Debian 10 and backed by 2M HugeTLBFS. Inside the nested VM ran a workload that aggressively accessed memory across 6 threads. Tracepoints during the migration confirmes eager page splitting occurred, both for the direct TDP MMU mappings, and the nested MMU mappings. Version Log ----------- v4: - Limit eager page splitting to nested MMUs [Sean] - Use memory caches for SP allocation [Sean] - Use kvm_mmu_get_page() with NULL vCPU for EPS [Sean] - Use u64 instead of bit field for shadow translation entry [Sean] - Add Sean's R-b to "Use a bool" patch. - Fix printf warning in "Cache access bits" patch. - Fix asymmentrical pr_err_ratelimit() + WARN() [Sean] - Drop unnecessary unsync check for huge pages [Sean] - Eliminate use of we in comments and change logs [Sean] - Allocate objects arrays dynamically [Ben] v3: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220401175554.1931568-1-dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx/ - Add R-b tags from Peter. - Explain direct SPs in indirect MMUs in commit message [Peter] - Change BUG_ON() to WARN_ON_ONCE() in quadrant calculation [me] - Eliminate unnecessary gotos [Peter] - Drop mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc() [Peter] - Also update access cache in mmu_set_spte() if was_rmapped [Peter] - Fix number of gfn bits in shadowed_translation cache [Peter] - Pass sp to make_huge_page_split_spte() to derive level and exec [me] - Eliminate flush var in kvm_rmap_zap_collapsible_sptes() [Peter] - Drop NULL pte_list_desc cache fallback [Peter] - Fix get_access to return sp->role.access. [me] - Re-use split cache across calls to CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG for better perf [me] - Top-up the split cache outside of the MMU lock when possible [me] - Refactor prepare_to_split_huge_page() into try_split_huge_page() [me] - Collapse PATCH 20, 23, and 24 avoid intermediate complexity [Peter] - Update the RISC-V function stage2_ioremap() [Anup] v2: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220311002528.2230172-1-dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx/ - Add performance data for workloads that mix reads and writes [Peter] - Collect R-b tags from Ben and Sean. - Fix quadrant calculation when deriving role from parent [Sean] - Tweak new shadow page function names [Sean] - Move set_page_private() to allocation functions [Ben] - Only zap collapsible SPTEs up to MAX_LEVEL-1 [Ben] - Always top-up pte_list_desc cache to reduce complexity [Ben] - Require mmu cache capacity field to be initialized and add WARN() to reduce chance of programmer error [Marc] - Fix up kvm_mmu_memory_cache struct initialization in arm64 [Marc] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20220203010051.2813563-1-dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx/ David Matlack (20): KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize MMU page cache lookup for all direct SPs KVM: x86/mmu: Use a bool for direct KVM: x86/mmu: Derive shadow MMU page role from parent KVM: x86/mmu: Decompose kvm_mmu_get_page() into separate functions KVM: x86/mmu: Consolidate shadow page allocation and initialization KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages KVM: x86/mmu: Move guest PT write-protection to account_shadowed() KVM: x86/mmu: Pass memory caches to allocate SPs separately KVM: x86/mmu: Replace vcpu with kvm in kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page() KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() KVM: x86/mmu: Allow for NULL vcpu pointer in __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page() KVM: x86/mmu: Pass const memslot to rmap_add() KVM: x86/mmu: Decouple rmap_add() and link_shadow_page() from kvm_vcpu KVM: x86/mmu: Update page stats in __rmap_add() KVM: x86/mmu: Cache the access bits of shadowed translations KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU KVM: x86/mmu: Zap collapsible SPTEs at all levels in the shadow MMU KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor drop_large_spte() KVM: Allow for different capacities in kvm_mmu_memory_cache structs KVM: x86/mmu: Extend Eager Page Splitting to nested MMUs .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 3 +- arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 1 + arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 5 +- arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 2 + arch/riscv/kvm/mmu.c | 14 +- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 22 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 711 ++++++++++++++---- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h | 17 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 17 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 13 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 + include/linux/kvm_types.h | 9 +- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 17 +- 16 files changed, 675 insertions(+), 167 deletions(-) base-commit: 150866cd0ec871c765181d145aa0912628289c8a -- 2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
