On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> -static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> - struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> +static void __link_shadow_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache, u64 *sptep,
> + struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> {
> u64 spte;
>
> @@ -2297,12 +2300,17 @@ static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
>
> mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
>
> - mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, sptep);
> + mmu_page_add_parent_pte(cache, sp, sptep);
>
> if (sp->unsync_children || sp->unsync)
> mark_unsync(sptep);
> }
>
> +static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
Nit, would prefer to wrap here, especially since __link_shadow_page() wraps.
> +{
> + __link_shadow_page(&vcpu->arch.mmu_pte_list_desc_cache, sptep, sp);
> +}
> +
> static void validate_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> unsigned direct_access)
> {
> --
> 2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
