Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 04:30:47PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 02:08:01PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> >> Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> >> >> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:47:31AM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> >> Sorry this has been sitting in my tree so long. The changes are fairly >> >> >> minor from v2. I no longer split the tests up into TCG and KVM >> >> >> versions and instead just ensure that ERRATA_FORCE is always set when >> >> >> run under TCG. >> >> >> >> >> >> Alex Bennée (3): >> >> >> arm64: remove invalid check from its-trigger test >> >> >> arm64: enable its-migration tests for TCG >> >> >> arch-run: do not process ERRATA when running under TCG >> >> >> >> >> >> scripts/arch-run.bash | 4 +++- >> >> >> arm/gic.c | 16 ++++++---------- >> >> >> arm/unittests.cfg | 3 --- >> >> >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> 2.30.2 >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> kvmarm mailing list >> >> >> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm >> >> > >> >> > Hi Alex, >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for this. I've applied to arm/queue, but I see that >> >> > >> >> > FAIL: gicv3: its-trigger: inv/invall: dev2/eventid=20 pending LPI is received >> >> > >> >> > consistently fails for me. Is that expected? Does it work for you? >> >> >> >> doh - looks like I cocked up the merge conflict... >> >> >> >> Did it fail for TCG or for KVM (or both)? >> > >> > Just TCG, which was why I was wondering if it was expected. I've never run >> > these tests with TCG before. >> >> Hmm I think expecting the IRQ at all is broken so I think I should >> delete the whole pending test. > > Feel free to repost. I'll update the patches in arm/queue before my next > MR. Actually I think the problem was with a regression in the TCG ITS support (now fixed in master). So I believe as of v3 everything is correct (and v4 should be ignored). Are you happy to apply this series or do you want me to repost it as v5? > > Thanks, > drew -- Alex Bennée _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
