On 2021-11-30 11:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 10/26/21 18:12, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 26/10/21 17:41, Marc Zyngier wrote:
This needs a word on why kvm_psci_vcpu_suspend does not need the
hooks. Or it needs to be changed to also use kvm_vcpu_wfi in the
PSCI
code, I don't know.
Marc, can you review and/or advise?
I was looking at that over the weekend, and that's a pre-existing
bug. I would have addressed it independently, but it looks like you
already have queued the patch.
I have "queued" it, but that's just my queue - it's not on kernel.org
and it's not going to be in 5.16, at least not in the first batch.
There's plenty of time for me to rebase on top of a fix, if you want
to send the fix through your kvm-arm pull request. Just Cc me so that
I understand what's going on.
Since a month has passed and I didn't see anything related in the
KVM-ARM pull requests, I am going to queue this patch. Any conflicts
can be resolved through a kvmarm->kvm merge of either a topic branch
or a tag that is destined to 5.16.
Can you at least spell out *when* this will land?
There is, in general, a certain lack of clarity about what you are
queuing,
where you are queuing it, and what release it targets.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
