Hi Raghavendra,
On Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:34:27 +0100,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Make use of the register read/write definitions from
> sysreg.h, instead of the existing definitions. A syntax
> correction is needed for the files that use write_sysreg()
> to make it compliant with the new (kernel's) syntax.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/debug-exceptions.c | 28 +++++++++----------
> .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/processor.h | 13 +--------
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/debug-exceptions.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/debug-exceptions.c
> index e5e6c92b60da..11fd23e21cb4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/debug-exceptions.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/debug-exceptions.c
> @@ -34,16 +34,16 @@ static void reset_debug_state(void)
> {
> asm volatile("msr daifset, #8");
>
> - write_sysreg(osdlr_el1, 0);
> - write_sysreg(oslar_el1, 0);
> + write_sysreg(0, osdlr_el1);
> + write_sysreg(0, oslar_el1);
The previous patch has obviously introduced significant breakage which
this patch is now fixing. In the interval, the build is broken, which
isn't great.
You can either rework this series to work around the issue, or I can
squash patches #2 and #3 together.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
